Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for June, 2010

The Second World War happened seventy years ago and , as the WWII generation dies off, the war itself is fast fading from our memories. At  the beginning of the 21st century, almost one thousand veterans of the Good War were dying every day. Ken Burns, in the introduction to the  book ” World War II : An Intimate  History ” says that that  one of his reasons for writing the book was to preserve the memories of those who had participated in it , to acquaint the modern generation with part of their history that was rapidly being forgotten. He says that an unacceptably large number of today’s high school seniors are under the impression that America sided with Germany against Russia in World War 2. Imagine that ! Ken Burns’ book will go a long way towards allieviating such ignorance as it provides by far the most comprehensive and balanced account of World War II that I have read, and I have read quite a few.

Most books on the subject stick to military matters and usually focus on the War in Europe.They concentrate on the big battles and fail to adequately describe the heroism of the ordinary grunts and the horrors they endured. They gloss over the unpalatable aspects of the war and do not convey the extent to which it affected an entire generation, both those who went off to war and those whom they left behind. Burns is able to avoid these pitfalls because of his unique approach, a mixture of oral history and straightforward reporting.

In planning this book , Burns decided to examine the manner in which the war affected four widely disparate American towns : Luverne MN , Sacramento CA , Mobile AL.  and Waterbury, CT. During  the two years of research that resulted in this book, his resarchers mined the information from diaries,letters, newpaper columns and other first hand accounts and used it to supplement the data gathered from more conventional sources.

The trouble with oral histories is that they sometimes miss the big picture. Conventional histories,  on the other hand, fail to educate us as to how the common man was affected by cataclysmic events. By combining the two approaches , Ken Burns and Geoffrey Ward are able to give us the best of both , a personalised history of the war that yet gives us an accurate account of the whole. We read about people like 8- year old Sacha Weinzheimer and her family who spent the war in a Japanese internment camp in the Philippines and Corporal George Frazier who survived the hellish Bataan Death March and the horrors being a POW in a Japanese labor camp.We empathize with Quentin Aanenson, the country boy from Luverne who became a fighter pilot and saw extensive  combat in the skies over Europe to return home and marry  the girl he had met and courted in Baton Rouge LA. We feel the emotions of those who enlisted the day after Pearl Harbor, their experiences in boot camp and later on under fire in Guadalcanal, Tarawa, Tunisia, Sicily , Cassino, Normandy and a dozens of other famous battles. We are moved by the plight of the Japanese -Americans who were interned for the duration of the war as ” enemy aliens” even as their brethren were displaying unparalleled bravery on the battlefields of Europe. All these are brought home to us  by first person accounts and by photographs that document what it was to live through those times.

In giving us these stories , the authors also cast light on some little known details. For instance , I remember reading about the bravery of the all- Japanese- American regiment, the 442nd but I hadn’t known of the initial friction  between the Japanese Americans born on the mainland  and those from Hawaii. I hadn’t known either of the animosity between black and white workers in the shipyards of Mobile which led briefly to a race riot.  And even though I’d read of the incredible war effort as America  mobilized for the war, nothing brought it home to me as some of the statistics in this book.” In 1941, more than 3 million cars were manufactured in the United States. Only 139 were made during the entire war. “ And “ At its vast Willow Run plant in Ypsilanti, Michigan– 67 acres of assembly lines under a single roof–the Ford Motor Company performed something like a miracle , twenty four hours a day. The average Ford Motor car had 15,000 parts. The B-24 long range bomber had 1,550,000. One came off the line every sixtythree minutes .”  Seems scarcely credible, doesn’t it ?

History is written by the victors and they tend to concentrate on the high points while glossing over or competely neglecting the not-so-palatable details. That certainly is not true of this book . In it we read of the German Blitz of London but we are also told of theAllied  fire-bombing of Dresden and Hamburg which was worse than anything the British endured. We are told of the blunders of the vain glorious  General Mark Clark, the foibles of the British Commander Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery and his thirst for power, and the infighting among the Allied Generals. No punches are pulled as  the book describes the uncaring stupidity of  Gen John Dahlquist who repeatedly ordered the 442nd into one battle after another against overwhelming enemy firepower —all because he did not want to be accused of being reluctant to engage the enemy. Through it all , we are awestruck by the everyday heroism of the ” ordinary” G.I , whether on the beaches of Normandy or the jungles of the South Pacific. As we view the photographs of battlefield carnage , we realize that the horror of war depicted in the first fifteen minutes of  Steven Spielberg’s ” Saving Private Ryan” were not an exaggeration. We are also reminded of the adage that ” War brings death to the soldier, glory to the General”.

Modern day revisionists of history are fond of criticizing the U.S for dropping atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Some of them  see   racial undertones in that decision because the bombs were dropped on Japan rather than on Germany. Reading this book leaves no doubt in my mind that such revisionism is cynical and baseless. Firstly,  German cities were carpet bombed and reduced to rubble and civilian casualties were high , breaking the German resistance and leading to the German surrender. The Japanese however, inspite of the collapse of their overseas empire and the decomation of their armed forces, were still defiant even after they had retreated to the Japanese mainland. Their extreme sense of honor would not permit them to surrender even though they had no hope of victory. They were determined to fight to the death and force the civilians to commit mass suicide , as in fact happened at Okinawa.  For the Allies to have invaded the mainland in pursuit of a final victory would have resulted in a million casualties and a wholesale slaughter of the POWs and mon-combatant aliens that they held. Hiroshima and Ngasaki were tragedies but the alternative would have resulted in even more deaths. No one reading this book and the parts about the fanaticism of the Japanese could think otherwise.

All in all , this is a book not to be missed if one wants a complete picture of a war that shaped the world we live in.

The War: An Intimate History 1941-1945. Geoffrey C. Ward and Ken Burns Knoph ( 2007). $ 50.

Read Full Post »

I was at Costco the other day when a pile of shirts caught my eye. I walked over and started looking for  my size a Medium. I went through the pile , several piles in fact, and found not even one Medium. Not one . There were plenty of Large, even more X- Large and even a few XX-Large .. but not one Medium. This is not the first time this has happened. It’s a scene that has been repeated at Walmart, JC Penney, Kohl’s etc. The situation with pants is a little better. I do find a couple of 36′s among all the 40′s and 44′s though I have to hunt for them.

Why is this so ? Is it that  the  regular  guys buy up all the mediums before I get there ? Or is it that the store buyers believe all the stories about the runaway obesity in America and load up on the larger sizes ? Looking at the piles of the large and X- Large sizes lying unsold, you’d think that the stores would wise up .

GET MORE MEDIUMS , DUMMIES  ! Not all of us are obese.

Read Full Post »

“The World Cup is like WW II .  France leaves early, the Italians are a nonentity, the Americans arrive late and England has to fight Germany.”   ( An entry on Facebook ).

Very astute . ( LOL). Who would have thought that soccer powers like France and Italy would not make it to the second round while Germany and England barely squeaked through.The teams in the round of 16 break down as follows : Europe (6) , South America (5) North America (2) , Asia (2) and Africa (1). By the luck of the draw, all the European teams will be pairing of against one  another. It looks as though the trend of European teams never having won the World Cup when it has been played outside of Europe will be true this time around too.

Of the results so far, the most shocking has to be the complete implosion of the French team . Many fans are saying that it is  the bad karma forom their World Cup qualifying match against Ireland when Thierry Henry’s  hand ball enabled France  to slip through but not even they would have imagined that things could go so wrong for the French.While I’m no supporter of the French , it has been painful to watch the shenanigans on and off the field culminating in the refusal of the French coach to shake hands with the South African coach after a loss in their final game. Domecq seems to be a fruitcake but this was an absolute low even for him. His beef was with his own players , not with the host South Africans , and his action was disgraceful. Good riddance to him and to the players ; I can’t imagine that they will ever play for France again.

Some observers have remarked that the decline of the European teams is due to the current structure of professional soccer. Lots of money, many foreign players and fewer opportunities for young players to develop. The enormous amounts of money that players earn playing club soccer , often for countries other than their own , has vitiated national pride. Playing for one’s country is not the honor it once was  and is less important than how one performs for one’s club. Just as in cricket, it has resulted in a bunch of spoiled athletes whose primary motivation is money. Good riddance to them.

The USA- Ghana match is this afternoon and I , like an increasing number of Americans, will be glued to the set.I hope the U.S doesn’t dig an early hole for itself as it has done in past matches. In the knockout stage, it is much more difficult to come back from an early deficit as they did against England and Slovakia. It would be nice also if they didn’t wait until stoppage time to score the decisive goal. Landon Donovan’s 91st  minute goal was thrilling but it was nerve wracking. Please , Team USA, have pity on us !

 Not to look past Ghana, but a win today and the U.S would have a good chance of of making the semis. What a boost it would be for soccer in America. Perhaps then it would shut up the ignorant trolls who infest soccer sites, yapping  that soccer is not” real ” football.

The Germany- England game will also be of great interest to many fans , myself included. Germany looked awesome in their first game game  ( yes, I know it was only against Australia ) and I hope they regain that form . England have looked lackluster throughout and they will have to show  more than have to date if they are to get past Germany. It was fun to read on Yahoo about the ( English born ) octopus in a German aquarium that has correctly ” predicted ” the results so far. For tomorrow’s match , it has picked Germany over England. Let’s see if it comes that comes true.

Of the rest , the Spain- Portugal and the Argentina – Mexico matches will be of most interest to me. I’m glad that yesterday’s matches resulted in Spain going through to meet Portugal rather than Brazil. These two , along with Argentina, are the  most artistic teams in the tournament and it would be a shame if they had to meet early in the tournament. May the best team win !!

Read Full Post »

Only a few cities  have sports franchises and their fans provide their home teams varying degrees of support. In some cities,  fans stick by their favorite team through good times and bad . In others, fans are fickle, quick to jump off the bandwagon when the team is not doing well. In order to judge which are the best sports cities in America , one has to judge  the commitment of its sports fans to their teams . Just how does one do it ?

There is of course no scientific way of measuring the degree to which sports fans support their teams, no statistics , not even any set criteria. In coming up with a list of the best sports cities in America , I’ve considered the following factors and , no , they are not arranged in order of importance. The factors are :

1. Number of professional sports teams in the city. Of course, one has to take the size of the city into consideration since big cities have a larger number of sports fans of all types. New York and Los Angeles have a decided advantage over the others.  Then again, cities in the South cannot be expected to have NHL franchises.

2. Relative success of the teams. Some cities  have not had a  championship team in ages and their fans have to be given greater credit for sticking by their teams.      

3.The rabidity of the fans as judged by their behavior at games and their comments on sports blogs .

4. The value of the sports franchises. I give this the least weight because the value is sometimes tied to an aggressive owner ( Dan Snyder of the Washington Redskins) , or a new stadium and shrewd marketing ( Jerry  Jones, Dallas Cowboys) At the same time , one cannot disregard the fact that  that three Boston teams the Celtics, the Red Sox and the New England Patriots are among the Most Valuable sports franchises in the U.S.

Taking all these factors into consideration , this is my list of the Best Sports Cities in America :

1. Boston has got to be the first by a country mile.Much smaller than New York and L.A , the city turns out in force for all four of its sports teams ( Celtics , Red Sox, Patriots and Red Sox) and its fans are  among the most passionate and knowledgeable. I give the Red Sox fans extra credit because they have endured decades of humiliation at the hands of the Yankees and Yankee fans before tasting success recently. I’m  a Laker fan ( who detests the Celtics and hates Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett) and a supporter of the Yankees and Giants ( but who nevertheless respects the Red Soxand likes the Patriots ) but I have to give Boston fans props for their loyalty and fervor.

2. New York fans are also very knowledgeable and , like those in Boston, very feisty. They too have suffered through long dry spells with the  Rangers and Jets. I include the Jets and the Giants  and Islanders among the New York teams because their fan base is mostly in N.Y.C and the team name still says New York. I exclude the Devils and the Nets for the similar  reasons.  Because of the multiplicity of sports teams ,  New York fans spend a lot of time hating their intra-city rivals but , at the same time , they have to be applauded for supporting so many teams. It’s got to be admitted that New Yorkers are a little spoilt because of the unparalleled success of the Yankees but overall, they are clearly second only to Boston. 

3. Los Angeles too has many sports and Laker fans are among the most rabid. I can’t fault L.A for not being to hold on to a football team since Al Davis is enough to try anyone’s patience. Give them extra credit for putting up with decades of futility with the Clippers.

4. Chicago. How can one not admire a city that is still waiting for the Cubs to hoist a championship banner ?

5. Washington is passionate about the  Redskins , less so about it’s baseball teams ( the Senators and now the Nationals). Considering it’s small population and relative poverty, one has to rank it high for its support of teams in all four sports particularly since the Nationals and Wizards are perrenial also-rans.

6. Denver. I’m impressed with the way its fans root for the Nuggets and I appreciate the fact that they support teams in all four sports inspite of the relatively small population.

7. Green Bay only has the Packers , the sole publicly owned team in all of the major sports. Kudos to its fans for turning out in all kinds of horrible weather… and for putting up for so long with Brett Favre ( just kidding !)

8. Portland , like  Green Bay,only has one pro team, the basketball TrailBlazers, but I appreciate the manner in which its fans  regularly sell out the Rose Garden and root for their team.

9. Pittsburgh fans have more to be happy about than fans in many other cities considering how successful the Steelers and, to a lesser extent  the Penguins, have been. However, they appear to have given up on the Pirates and I therefore rank them only ninth.

10. Philadelphia, in my opinion , has  the nastiest fans of all perhaps reflecting the hardnosed nature of the Flyers and Eagles. Maybe that’s the reason I don’t rank them higher ; they certainly are loud and committed.

Honorable Mention: New Orleans, Houston , Detroit, Indianapolis.

As I said at the outset, this ranking is purely subjective. It’s my opinion . What’s yours ?

Read Full Post »

To Western sensibilities, the idea of an arranged marriage is pure anathema. The idea of such an important decision, perhaps the most important decision of one’s life , being made by others is unthinkable. But , is it really ? The results of  an Indian study would seem to show otherwise.

Usha Gupta and Pushpa Singh of the University of Rajasthan interviewed 50 couples, half of whom had arranged marriages while the other half had married for love. The couples had been married for varying lengths of time ; some had been married for a year or less, others had been together for as long as twenty years.The couples were interviewed separately and asked to respond to questions on the Rubin Love Scale , developed by psychologist Zick Rubin forty years ago.

According to Rubin , romantic love is made up of three elements:

  1. Attachment: The need to be cared for and be with the other person.
  2. Caring: Valuing the other persons happiness and needs as much as your own.
  3. Intimacy: Sharing private thoughts, feelings, and desires with the other person.

 Rubin’s research was not confined only to married people  and it differentiated between “liking ” and ” loving”. One of his techniques was  to pose to subjects  13 questions  that he felt were a reliable measure of love. 

In the University of Rajasthan study, subjects were asked to respond to statements such as “ I like it when ( My husband / wife) confides in me.” or  ” I would do almost anything for my ” husband/wife”. The results of the study were very interesting.

The couples who had married for love, and who had been married for less than one year, had an average score of 70 points out of a possible 91. However, love couples who had been married for 10 years or longer only had an average score of 40, a steep decline indeed.  The corresponding numbers for those who were in an  arranged marriage were 58 points ( for those married less than a year) and  68 points ( for those who had been married for a decade or more). In short , the results would seem to confirm the popular saying that ” A love marriage is like a pot of hot water on a cold stove ; an arranged marriage is like a pot of cold water on a hot stove.”

To my mind, the results of the study are hardly conclusive. The study’s  chief shortcoming, in my opinion,  is that  the sample size ( 50 couples)  was miniscule . It failed to take into account any number  of variables such as type of arranged marriage ,ages,  economic level and education of participants , whether they lived in an urban or rural environment, their country of domicile  etc. I won’t try to enumerate the ways in which each of these factors could affect the study results ( there is not enough space) but I will touch briefly the first of them i.e. the different types of arranged marriages.

The old-fashioned type of arranged marriage was one in which the parents fixed the marriage by themselves without the boy and the girl having any say in the matter. Particularly in the rural areas of India, the marriage was arranged when the bride and groom were both children and often the two never even saw each others faces until their wedding night.It was more a contract between the families rather than a joining of individuals.  As societies modernize, this type of arranged marriage is becoming less common though it is still prevalent in villages and among members of certain religions ; even in such cases though , the boy and girl have a bit more say in the match. In most arranged marriages today, the parents or relatives are merely facilitators who introduce the boy and girl to each other after having satisfied themselves that their backgrounds are similar and that the two might be a good fit. The two meet and talk, sometimes go out together and then decide whether they want to go ahead with the match. Unlike the old days , both parties have a say in the matter and can turn down  the prospective alliance. Not only that but the marriage usually takes place after an engagement period during which the two get to know each other  better. As is clear, the second type of arranged marriage has a greater chance of success than the first.

While I  don’t know the details of the Rajasthan study, it seems that the couples studied were from urban areas like Jaipur and that their marriages were of the second type described above. Since they were presumably were educated  individuals, middle class or better, it is no surprise that the results of the study appeared to validate arranged marriages over love matches.I am not so sanguine. I think the issue is much more complex.

Advocates of arranged marriages are fond of pointing to the lower divorce rate for arranged marriages as compared to those for love matches. However, this is at least partly because in such societies girls are more dependent financially on their husbands. As these societies modernize, and women have careers of their own , the incidence of divorce is rising as women are no longer locked in an unhappy marriage. The Rajasthan University study was carried  out thirty years ago; if it were re-done today, I’m sure that the results would be significantly different.

Based purely on empirical data , having observed the marriages of friends and acquaintances over a forty-year period, I think that ,in general, arranged marriages in which both parties have met each other  and had a say in their getting hitched have a better chance of “success”   than love matches.  However, even in such cases there is no guarantee of success. I heard of one Indian American couple who celebrated  the weddings of their children ( a son and a daughter) to spouses from within their own community.  The marriages should have been a success since the parties were of similar backgrounds, had known each other before marriage and had good careers. Shockingly, both marriages ended in divorce within two years. And get this: the girl then met and married a Filipino doctor and the son wed a Korean girl and half a dozen years later they are all happy as can be.

What this tells me is that we can have any number of studies and generate all kinds of statistics but , after all is said and done , the outcome of an individual marriage is impossible to predict.

Read Full Post »

With the Lakers  crowned NBA Champions for the second consecutive year, the question is already being asked : Can the Lakers make it three in a row ? Can they threepeat ?Addressing the topic , NBA analyst Tim Legler said last night  that while there were several unknowns that could have an impact on the situation, the Lakers would have to be considered favorites to repeat as champions again.

In fac t there are so many such factors, that it is premature to make any definite predictions about next year. However , it is fun to speculate on such matters , so here goes…

L.A. Lakers: While it is true that they have a solid core ( Kobe Bryant, Pau Gasol, Ron Artest , Lamar Odom)  under contract for the next four years, the Lakers are not without their problems. Chief among them is whether Phil Jackson will return to coach  next year. There seem to be some strains between Jackson and the Lakers ownership with some rumors that he had been asked to take a substantiial pay cut , from $ 12 million to $ 5 million. After having led the Lakers to their 5th championship, it’s doubtful that management would have the nerve to suggest such a drastic pay cut but stranger things have been known to happen. Witness Phoenix , where Suns GM Steve Kerr preferred to resign rather than take a 10% cut in a year where the Suns had made it all the way to the Western Conference finals. Another factor clouding the issue of Jackson’s return is his health ; he may decide to walk away from it all. On the other hand, he has a solid chance at a threepeat and it may motivate him to come back , particularly if Lakers ownership makes it clear how much they want him to return. If  the Zen Master does not return , I hope they promote from within ( Brian Shaw ?) because I’m not impressed wih the leading outside candidate , Byron Scott. I feel that Scott, while he may be a good motivator, is not strong on the X’s and O’s and is poor at making adjustments on the fly.

There are two other problems the Lakers will have to address. One is the point guard position, where Derek Fisher will have to be eased out. Much as I love Fisher’s smarts and motivation and his ability to hit clutch shots, age has caught up with him. He is a defensive liability espescially against young , quick PG’s like Aaron Brooks, Chris Paul , Deron Williams etc. His shooting percentage and PPG have gone down markedly over the years and the Lakers need a young talent with Fisher coming off the bench. Unfortunately neither Jordan Farmar nor Shannon Brown seems to be the answer. Farmar is erratic and looks too much for his own shot rather thanto  pass the ball ; Shannon Brown , a terrific open court player is a one dimensional offensive talent. The one complaint I have about Phil’s coaching is that he employs a very short rotation ( which  gets even shorter in the playoffs ) and does not develop young talent. Sasha Vujacic (  vastly overpaid) and Adam Morrison ( a dud) are expiring contracts that will no doubt be on the block and Luke Walton ( another overpaid player ) is not of much use either. The bench needs to be overhauled but Mitch Kupchak will be hardpressed to do it seeing that the Lakers are already over the cap in a year when the cap is expected to be reduced  drastically. To make matters even worse, the Lakers don’t even have a first round pick, having traded it away to Washington . Best of luck , Mitch !!

Boston Celtics are probably even worse off. As is the case with the Lakers, the coach Doc Rivers is uncertain about his future and key assistant Tom Thibodeau, a defensive genius, has left for the head coaching job in Chicago. I thought Rivers and Thibodeau did a masterful job in Boston and they  will be difficult to replace.Rajon Rondo is on the way to becoming one of the elite point guards in the game but The Big Three of Kevin Garnett, Ray Allen and Paul Pierce are aging fast and can no longer carry the team by themselves. Of the three, Ray Allen is a free agent and the Celtics may let him go unless he can be signed at a substantially lower salary.Rasheed wallace is probably done  and the Celtics need to find a replacement for him and to upgrade the rest of the bench. Glen( Big Baby ) Davis is good but undersized and Tony Allen is almost wholly a defensive player. The Celtics need some young blood to spell Pierce and Garnett and re-vitalize the bench if they are to challenge for the title. Danny Ainge has been a very active GM and made some very good moves in the past ; he’ll have to do even more for next year.

Of the megastars who are free agents , LeBron James is the biggest and whichever team he signs with will be an instant contender. At the moment, no one seems to know which way he’s leaning , perhaps not even LBJ himself. Inspite of his strong ties to Cleveland, I doubt he will re-sign with the Cavaliers. The fluid situation there , with both the coach and GM yet to be replaced, would seem to militate against his returning there. Besides, I doubt that he sees Mitch Williams as a PG that he can rely on. If playing in a bigger market is his motivation, the Knicks  or the Nets ( new free-spending owner,good PG in Devin Harris, the #3 pick in the upcoming draft  and some existing talent in Brook Lopez ) are possiblities. If winning a title immediately is the main consideration, Miami and Chicago would seem to be a better fit. At Miami, he can play alongside another superstar, Dwayne Wade , but will he be willing to share the spotlight ? Chicago seems a more likely  possibility, since they have an elite PG in Derrick Rose,a well respected new coach in Tom Thibodeau , a pretty good supporting cast in Luol Deng, Kirk Heinrich , Taj Gibson, & Joakim Noah though there is some bad blood between him and the last named. I guess we will find out next month where he decides to cast his lot .

Chris Bosh is a great talent but I don’t rank him anywhere near as high  as high as  LBJ or Wade. Inspite of all the talk about a meeting between the three to discuss possibly playing together , I don’t think it’s going to happen. Of the existing threats to Laker dominance, all have some flaw or the other. The San Antonio Spurs are aging, the Dallas Mavericks don’t seem to get it right no matter what they do, the Phoenix Suns have an interfering owner, and the Denver Nuggets and Atlanta Hawks seem to have plateaued as have the Orlando Magic. However, we’ve seen this past season how a team can be strenghtened immeasurably by a few good trades as the Mavericks and Celtics showed . Yes, the Lakers are the front runners but a couple of big trades could change all that. It should be an interesting off -season.

Read Full Post »

Whew, I’m glad that’s over ! For most of last night’s game , it looked like the Celtics were going to pull off an improbable victory. Their offense may not have been great but their defense was stellar and Kobe Bryant wasn’t making things easier , forcing up shots even when double teamed. When the Lakers were still behind in the fourth, I was just about ready to give up. Then, miraculously, the Laker defense tightened , the Celtics ran out of gas and the Lakers got back in the game . As Kobe began to defer to his teammates instead of doing it all himself , as he concentrated on rebounding and passing the ball, they stepped up and bailed him out. Ron and Fish and Pau hit some shots and  Pau continued to be a beast on the boards as the Lakers inched ahead. I was just beginning to relax when the Celtics made one last ditch effort. Trailing by five , Rondo hustled after a rebound, got it in the right corner , turned and swished in a 3 to make it a two point game ! Rondo!! Rajon Freaking Rondo, whose jumper had deserted him,  who was barely making 50% of his free throws!! That same Rondo making a three !! Was this some omen ? Were the Lakers going to somehow lose  after coming so close ? The last 16 seconds took a long , long time before Sasha iced two free throws and it was finally, finally over and I could go to bed .. happy, happy, happy !! 

From a basketball point of view , this was not a  beautiful game. In the face of some stifling defense, both teams shot poorly. Both teams were tired, the Celtics more so,  and it showed. Still the intensity of the game was such , the tension so high that it kept us all glued to the spectacle. Kudos to the Celtics for a gutsy performance.  Handicapped by the loss of their starting center , Kendrick Perkins, they gave the Lakers all they could handle. In Perkins place, Rasheed Wallace played heroically before he fell prey to fatigue. The others too gave it their all and they have to feel proud of their season . A season in which they were only the fourth seeds but, in the playoffs,  defeated both LeBron James Cavaliers and Dwight Howard’s Magic to reach the finals .  As a lfelong Laker fan, I cordially detest the Celtics but even I have to give them a tip of the hat for their fighting spirit and their gallantry in defeat.

 I really really was banking on a Laker win last night. As I told a friend before the game , I could handle a Laker loss to the Magic or even to the Cavaliers. A loss to the Celtics would have been a different story. I well remember the blowout loss  to the 2008 Celtics  after which Boston fans pelted the Laker team bus with stones. I remember Kevin McHale’s clotheslining Kurt Rambis as he went for a layup in the 1984 finals . I even remember Jerry West’s heroic 44 point performance in a loss to the Celtics in the 1969 finals. That’s what makes this Laker victory all the sweeter. The manner in which Ron Artest broke down , the way in which Derek Fisher and Pau Gasol had tears streaming down thir cheeks, and a giddy Kobe Bryant  a showed how much they valued this championship, the hardest won of them all.

 Last year I was not happy with the way in which the two Buss sons grabbed the spotlight at the trophy presentation. This year, I was glad to see the players and coach take centerstage. After all , it was they who won the trophy. The one person I thought was neglected both at the presentation ceremony and in the post game shows was Mitch Kupchak, the Laker GM. It was he who put together this team , his latest move being to snap up Ron Artest and let Trevor Ariza go. Yesterday, Ron-Ron validated his move and in fact was the MVP of game 7 : 20 points, 5 steals and terrific , lockdown defense on Paul Pierce. Good job, Mitch!

Tomorrow, in my next post, I’ll speculate about what the future holds for the Lakers and who their chief rivals will be as they go for a threepeat next year but for now I just want to revel in the moment. GO LAKERS !! WORLD CHAMPS,  BACK TO BACK , BABY !! 

Read Full Post »

I’m sick and tired of  vuvuzelas, those ubiquitous horns that spectators blow continuously at the World Cup matches in South Africa.Their tuneless blare, heard nonstop throughout matches, is annoying and disruptive and it detracts from the game.

Years ago , I was attending a Celtics- Knicks game in Madison Square Garden and a Celtics fan blew an airhorn whenever the Celtics scored. At first , the neighboring fans put up with the noise though they visibly flinched whenever it sounded. Pretty soon though, it got to be more than they could tolerate and Security was summoned. The security guard told the fan to cut it out and she complied .. for the next two minutes. Then , her enthusiasm got the better of her and she couldn’t restrain herself. B-L-A-A-T. Security came by again and unceremoniously hustled her out the door as all the fans in the section applauded.

At least, that was a single horn and it was blown only at intervals. The vuvuzelas are blown for the full ninety minutes for the match and the massed effect of hundreds of them results in a wall of sound reaching 130 decibels, enough to create hearing loss according to some experts. I could have been ( alittle bit) more sympathetic if the horns were not blown continuously, if they were sounded to celebrate the home team scoring a goal or ,say, if the home team won. However, the vuvuzelas are blown continuously at every match , not just when South Africa are playing. It could be Netherlands versus Denmark but the vuvuzelas are just as loud. As one fan remarked “Crowd involvement is so much better when it has at least a hint of relevance to the spectacle, rather than noise for noise’s sake…”

Everyone seems to hate the vuvuzelas: fans, TV viewers, broadcasters and players. Fans can buy earplugs and TV viewers can turn down the sound or buy an MP3 device that acts as a noise canceller by using a series of inverted sound waves to silence the sound of the horns but the players are helpless. They can’t use earplugs because they need to communicate with each other as a play is developing.The vuvuzelas make that impossible.Potugese star, Christian Ronaldo, said that the noise “makes it difficult to concentrate”. Argentina’s wizard Lionel Messi says that ” it is important to communicate on the pitch. (This ) is like being deaf “.

Sepp Blatter, the FIFA president, seemed to sympathiize and had floated the idea of banning vuvzelas at games. A  day later, he backtracked . No doubt , he did not want to offend the host country and lacked the balls to do the right thing. A vuvuzela ban would have been the way to go, the only way to go.

As was only to be expected, some contrarians see this as a clash between European sensibilities and African traditions. To them , I say (a) it’s not just Europeans who find the noise distracting , it’s the entire world, South Africa excepted and (b) Who says that all traditions are good ? What kind of tradition is it to blow a cheap plastic horn throughout a match ? When this stupid  ” tradition” begins to interfere with the game it’s time to get rid of it.

This time around , the vuvuzelas have won but , in the not too distant future, I predict that a ban on vuvuzelas will be a prerequisite for scheduling any international tournaments in South Africa.

A final thought: After South Africa’s opening game which resulted in a tie, South African goalie Itumeleng Khune was quoted was saying “We could hardly hear the fans who were quiet at stages during the game.We want more support and louder vuvuzelas when we play our next match.”  That does it ! I’m rooting against South Africa from now on !!

Read Full Post »

Our cruise to Alaska was a wonderful experience and we thoroughly enjoyed it …but  not in the way we expected. Before embarking  on the cruise , we had heard a lot about such cruises from friends who had taken one earlier. Mostly the talk was about the glaciers and the wildlife. For us, the reality was quite different from what we had imagined . There were no cliffs of ice collapsing into the sea, no large floating icebergs ( those I think can only be seen in Antartica), no close encounters with whales and moose and bears ( though tour guides kept saying how they had seen them on a trip just the other day or just last week). We did see several mother seals and their pups on the floating ice in Tracy Arm Fjord and there were plenty of golden eagles wheeling about in Juneau and Ketchikan but as for anything else… nada , zip, nothing. We could perhaps have taken a whale watching excursion but such trips are expensive and , in  my opinion and that of others, not worth it ; besideswhale sightings are not guaranteed . This was not a disappointment because even had we seen these animals it would have been only at a distance and from far away. To really get a close up look , one would be better off going to the zoo or to SeaWorld  or watching a nature video.

What was most enjoyable was the natural beauty and the sheer size of Alaska. We saw only a small corner of south east Alaska but it gave us an appreciation for the vastness and the unspoiled nature of the Alaskan wilderness. When one thinks about Alaska, one thinks of it as it is in winter, snowcovered and freezing ly cold. Alaska in summer is a different proposition. The peaks are still snow covered but the land is green , the temperatures  in the fifties even in late May.The tree covered hills, the thousands of little waterfalls coursing down them , the hundreds of little islands and the miles and miles of coastline without any human habitation whatsoever are scenes that stick in one’s memory. The towns too are enjoyable and have a sixties feel to them. Most of the land excursions are expensive and deliver less than they seem to promise. I don’t regret taking the Duck Tour in Ketchikan ( we’d never ridden in an amhibious vehicle before) or the tramway up the hillside in Juneau but the van tour of Juneau” to see the glacier’and the  rail-bus journeys in Skagway are a costly waste. Stay away from the shops selling jewelry ; their markups are exorbitant. One piece of jewelry that my wife liked was originally offered at $ 1,200 but the shopkeeper eventually came down to $ 350. ( No, we did not buy it). A trip without ‘souvenirs’ is unthinkable but think twice before you buy an Ullu knife, a half moon-shaped knife that is a smaller version of the italian mezzaluna . When you come back to the ship it you have to surrender it for storage in the ships lockers; you can reclaim it only after you disembark. Aside from the inconvenience, I doubt how much use it will be put to once you return home; an ullu doesn’t do anything an ordinary knife doesn’t. We’ve used our’s exactly once in the two weeks we ‘ve been back and that was just to try it out.

If I had known then what I know now  I’d have read up on Alaska before we started out on the cruise.A week or two spent reading an Alaska guidebook ( Frommers is a goodone ) and a short history of Alaska particularly the Gold Rush days would have made me more knowledgeable than any tour guide and made our exploration of the towns so much more interesting.

Read Full Post »

This was only the second cruise we had taken, the first being a week long trip from Los Angeles down south to the ‘Mexican Riviera’, Puerto Vallarta, Mazatlan and Cabo San Lucas. That cruise, ten years ago, was on the Carnival Lines ” Elation”. The ship this time, the Celebrity ” Infinity” was somewhat larger but life on board was much the same.The “Infinity” is one of the newer ships afloat , having been built in 2001 , and the passengers were a different lot than we had encountered on the cruise to Mexico.  They were decidedly older and more serious as was only to be expected on a cruise to Alaska rather than to sunny Mexico.There were some other differences that we noticed too.

Food and drink: An overabundance of food is one of the hallmarks of a cruise and on the “Infinity” , the food was as plentiful as ever. We noticed , however, that the portion sizes at the sitdown dinners were  smaller than we remembered. A good thing because previously they were too large and resulted in a lot of waste. Those diners who wanted more, and there were a few of them , could order seconds or more than one appetizer / dessert / entree if they so desired. Generally, most passengers went to one of the many buffets for breakfast and lunch but met at night for a sitdown dinner. There was plenty of choice at the buffets. For instance, there were five or six breakfast buffet stations including an Asian one ( congee w/ different toppings and Asian -inspired vegetable selections ) , an Omlette stand where omlettes were made to order, an American style breakfast buffet with scrambled eggs, bacon , ham, potatoes , breads etc, an English breakfast station with bangers and mash and thick cut English bacon, and yet another station with croissants, brioches, bagels and other assorted breads.I enjoyed them all , particularly the bangers and mash w/ rashers of bacon , the omlettes made to order, the congee and the brioches,  the King of  Breads which one rarely comes across in the U.S. Lunch was similarly eclectic with pizzas, salads, a pasta bar, cold cuts and a selection of vegetarian and meat entrees. The pizza was surprisingly good , with a thin crisp crust and a wide choice of toppings.Dinners featured a choice of  four entrees and a similar number of appetizers , salads and desserts. One afternoon brunch featured all kinds of fish and cold cuts and Alaskan King crab legs and it was a little off-putting to see many passengers loading their plates with the crab legs to the exclusion of everything else. Can anyone really enjoy gorging on food in that fashion ? I couldn’t help noticing the number of grotesquely obese people , at least a dozen of them on motorized wheelchairs, and they were not shy about loading up their plates. The cruise director joked on the last evening that the Seattle airport authorities had informed him that they would not be weighing luggage but that they would be weighing the passengers.

No matter how good the food is ,no matter how much variety there is  one gets tired of eating at the same place all the time. After awhile one gets tired of the roast beef, the steaks, the halibut and the prime rib, delicious though they are.And so it was with us. About the fifth day out we craved something else and so we asked for some of the Indian food that the crew ate ( There were a large number of Goans , Indians from Goa, among the cabin crew). It was a nice change from the regular menu, good though it was. A word to Asian Indians who are contemplating going on a cruise: if Indian vegetarian food is a must for you, you are better off going on a Masala cruise which will cater to your tastes. It is unrealistic to expect  a similar amount of choice on a regular cruise.

Passengers are not allowed to get their own  liquor onboard though beer, wine and any type of hard liquor you desire may be ordered from the ubiquitous waiters who are always hovering around. If you insist on getting your own wine on board, there is a prohibitive corkage fee of $ 25 / bottle. I had thought on our earlier cruise that this yet one more way of extracting cash from passengers by forcing them to order single drinks aboard. Maybe so, but I think an even greater consideration is to avoid drunkenness on board. It is difficult to get drunk when a drink sets you back $5- $8 + a 15% gratuity.

Entertainment and activities: There was a whole slew of shows and activities to keep passengers entertained during the cruise and there was something for every taste.As far as shows went we attended a Las Vegas style song-and-dance review, as good as anything in Vegas though on a much smaller scale, and a magic / stand-up comedy double feature ( the comedian was very good , the magician ordinary). However the best time we had was at a series of nature talks given by the onboard naturalist, Brent Nixon. Not expecting very much, I missed the first talk in the series, on ” Golden Eagles ” . Those who did catch it were so full of praise that I made it a point to attend the other two lectures, on ” Killer Whales ( Orcas) ” and ” Seals , Sea Lions and Walruses”. Mr. Nixon, a former U.S. Army Ranger before he became a naturalist, illustrated his slides by mimiciking the actions of the animals he was describing. He undulated across the stage on his belly to show how seals move and he flopped, he barked , he grunted as he shared his vast knowledge of animal lore.  He was both  informative and enthralling as for instance he described what seal milk tastes like. (Not at all like milk; more like a concentrated fish extract because it has to resemble the food a baby seal will eat after it is weaned). Didn’t know that, did you ? If you are ever on a ship where one of Brent Nixon’s talks is scheduled , don’t miss it !

Every afternoon and evening there was one dance band or another providing music that passengers could dance to. Besides this there were contests of many kinds ( beanbag throwing, trivia , Who wants to be a millionaire , cooking contests etc. etc). There were classes in painting, beadwork , flower arranging, cooking , wine tasting, and God knows what else. There were also tours of the ships galley ( or kitchens) where one got some idea of how the complement of 129 cooks and helpers managed to turn out 9,000 meals a day.There was also a cardroom where guests could meet and play backgammon, pinochle, gin rummy or solitaire. ( Unfortunately,and surprisingly, we were unable to find another pair to play bridge with us.) For those interested in reading, there was a 2,000 volume library that, with its cosy atmosphere and its deep cushioned chairs, was ideal for reading. I managed to finish Stieg Larsson’s  Scandinavian mystery, ” The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo”, a magnificent book with a most unusual heroine , a self taught computer hacker cum martial artist. It’s the middle book of a trilogy and I’m now reading its companion volumes.

The one thing the ship did not have was good satellite reception and hence TV. Not that one wants to be glued to a TV set on a cruise but it would have been nice to watch the Laker games.The only things to be seen on TV were CNN, ESPN and a mix of cable channels , all only occasionally. What was available round the clock was a shipboard channel incessantly going on about , shopping, touting land excursions that passengers could sign up for and giving a rundown of onboard programs for the day. I could have done without it , espescially since it came on as soon as the TV was switched on before one could go to the sports or news channel.

The best part of a  cruise is sitting on the cabin’s balcony or on the upper deck  and just looking out at the sea in all its moods. I particularly enjoyed seeing the ship enter a new port. The first glimpse of the buildings ashore, the warehouses , the jetty ,the ships already in port,  feeling the speed gradually decrease to almost nothing , admiring as the captain and pilot slowly inch the giant liner into its berth with deft manipulations of the powerful bow thrusters… these are things that I could never tire of.Watching the ship’s propellors churn the sea into a frothy wake , marvelling at the vast expanse of the sea , drinking in the beauty of the snow clad peaks on either side , standing on the upper deck near the bow as the ship picked i s way among the floating ice of Tracy Arm Fjord are the lasting memories I will have of our Alaska cruise.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

47 Japanese Farms: Japan Through The Eyes of Its Rural Communities -- 47日本の農園

A journey through 47 prefectures to capture the stories of Japan's farmers and rural communities

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 36 other followers

%d bloggers like this: